The Hound Of Baskervilles By Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW4270ExpZQ3ypV6nw-oJzG8BME6cjA9-01pe-Vvc58qt0YoFHuj0LxMo9iOIOMaxanXNl_Z3FrSnFncat5hJU4Czw5spyKSMqMswup6bufsC-Zf5oIIobIdCr5KQ7Coqbcd1Y6MLKsNdGSajK9cp2MoW_OHrhauPZRij11iS6wEQxREBWXV3LG-dD/w218-h320/8921._SY475_.jpg)
Yayyy!!Finally I could read a classic-crime-mystery novel in a single-sitting!!! I have never-ever reviewed crime thrillers, will try to do justice for the benefit of the readers and myself (in preserving notes) :P Q. For someone like me, who is mercurial, and not into crime or murder mysteries, why would I pick one? A. Trying to add a bit of excitement and transforming a languid lazy day into a gleeful one! Additionally, to test the waters, and check if a volatile being like me can stay riveted throughout without oscillating. And yes, this book kept me engaged, though I took a couple of coffee breaks. Moreover, the novel isn’t ginormous at all! Q. Does this bewildering case of the fiendish hound, case of supernaturalism vs pragmatism, tug out my heart strings? A. It did heighten the spirits, but maybe the outgrown rationalism wasn’t sated. The naïve, innocent, and the guileless would admire it to the core, but livi...