The Hound Of Baskervilles By Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Yayyy!!Finally I could read a classic-crime-mystery novel in a single-sitting!!!
I have never-ever
reviewed crime thrillers, will try to do justice for the benefit of the readers
and myself (in preserving notes) :P
Q. For someone like me, who is mercurial, and not into crime or
murder mysteries, why would I pick one?
A.
Trying to add a bit of
excitement and transforming a languid lazy day into a gleeful one!
Additionally, to test the waters, and check if a volatile being like me can
stay riveted throughout without oscillating. And yes, this book kept me engaged,
though I took a couple of coffee breaks. Moreover, the novel isn’t ginormous at
all!
Q. Does this bewildering case of the fiendish hound, case of supernaturalism
vs pragmatism, tug out my heart strings?
A.
It did heighten the
spirits, but maybe the outgrown rationalism wasn’t sated. The naïve, innocent,
and the guileless would admire it to the core, but living in a world of cause
and reason, where my being has witnessed a lot of pragmatism, and the
unexpected, the awe and the surprise element did amuse me, but did not land me
into a state of euphoria or utter-fear! <b>
Q. What is the plot all about?
A. Not delving into the plot
outline, as it would already be known due to existing swarming blurbs, or else
would not want to be known, as it is a crime-thriller. Sharing just a surface-level
outline to create the mystery:-
A stranger, leaves behind a
walking stick, in the absence of the duo - Sherlock Holmes and John Watson.
Holmes, corrects the fallacious guesswork of Watson, about the
walking stick. Holmes, conjectures about the stranger, Mr. Mortimer, are
verified, when the following day, Mr. Mortimer, visits them, on account
of the mysterious case of “The Curse of Baskervilles”. Readers are revealed
about Hugo Baskervilles, the Devonshire family curse, and the reason of
the menace of dogs. The descendant of Hugo, Charles(widower and childless, his
generous donations are chronicled in columns) has recently died mysteriously.
Holmes cites displeasure on not being notified and invited to the death-scene.
Dr. Mortimer, dithers the question by calling it a supernatural case,
and he needs advice on the new claimant of the estate, Sir Henry Baskerville(younger
brother of Charles), the new heir, who is in grave danger next from the diabolical
hound! Henry and Mortimer, visit Holmes the next day, with a news of Henry
being warned by someone to keep away from the moor. Barrymore, Henry’s butler,
is the prime suspect of Charles’s murder. Subsequently, we are introduced to Stapleton,
Henry’s neighbor, who is aware about Holmes and Watson, and the hound and
Charles. The story sets into motion…
##################################
Q. What appealed and
engaged me the most?
A. The novel opens, with a hint of
danger loitering from a family fiend and not human beings! The combination of
the gothic and the detective elements,
The scientific mystery around the
phosphorus which I had pre-read from the blurbs,
The writing style which imitates a
sense of urgency and straightforwardness, and hence kept me focused,
and the remarkable insoluble-crime
solving intrepid-duo of Sherlock Holmes, with an impeccable sense of observation,
imperceptibly fantastic sense of reasoning and rationality, and his loyal friend,
Watson, setting out to fight out the case of the diabolical hound. <b>These
were more-than-enough reasons to keep me engaged!
Q. Was the ending satisfying?
A. With a comfortable ending and
no cliffhangers, the ending was fulfilling. Though gradually as the plot progressed,
I could conjecture, who the culprit could be!
But, for the unforeseeable,
unanticipated and applaudable dramatic element introduced around the convict
towards the plot-ending, a solid 4 stars!!
#######################################
My best-loved quotes on
wisdom from the novel(in no-particular-order):-
“I presume nothing.”
“Evil indeed is the man who has
not one woman to mourn him.”
“There’s a light in a woman’s eyes
that speaks louder than words.”
“The world is full of obvious
things which nobody by any chance ever observes.”
My all-time -fav:
“If he was vulnerable, he was
mortal, and if we could wound him, we could kill him.”
Comments
Post a Comment